TOWING RULE
Posted: 08 Mar 2016, 10:43
There has been some debate concerning the towing rule.
We've already started talking with a few experienced mech guys for their input, and we've also contacted NAF HQ to ask them to do the same. All thogether, we can combine our inputs and send that to BE.
This thread exists to add extra opinions to that framework. You may be an experienced mech guy (or girl, UPIR is an equal opportunities employer) but just don't happen to be on the close contact list of our HQ personnel, or you may be of any other specialisation within our forces with a valid input, anything's possible.
If you've got something useful to say about the towing rule, jot it down in here.
NOTE: When commenting, please consider this rule as here to stay. Comments saying that the rule should be cancelled alltogether aren't helping improving it. As I said in the respective thread, this is innovation, let's help it.
We've already started talking with a few experienced mech guys for their input, and we've also contacted NAF HQ to ask them to do the same. All thogether, we can combine our inputs and send that to BE.
This thread exists to add extra opinions to that framework. You may be an experienced mech guy (or girl, UPIR is an equal opportunities employer) but just don't happen to be on the close contact list of our HQ personnel, or you may be of any other specialisation within our forces with a valid input, anything's possible.
If you've got something useful to say about the towing rule, jot it down in here.
NOTE: When commenting, please consider this rule as here to stay. Comments saying that the rule should be cancelled alltogether aren't helping improving it. As I said in the respective thread, this is innovation, let's help it.